Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Late TDS Interest Not Deductible Under Section 201(1A); Search-Based Additions Invalid Without Incriminating Evidence

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT ruled on multiple issues in a tax appeal. Interest paid on late TDS deposits under s.201(1A) was held non-deductible as it neither qualifies as business expenditure nor compensatory payment. Regarding additions in unabated assessment years during search proceedings, following SC precedent in Abhisar Buildwell, additions were deleted due to lack of incriminating material. Notice under s.153C was upheld valid as search warrant and panchnama were not issued in assessee's name. Addition under s.69C was deleted as CIT(A) found sufficient opening cash balance as of 01.04.2017 to justify transactions, and AO failed to prove actual cash payments versus mere projections.....