TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (2) TMI 673
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....I for a period of six months and also directed him to pay a compensation of Rs.5 ,00,000/- to the complainant within two months from the date of judgment, in default, to undergo SI for two months. The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court was also confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 4. The facts of the case in brief are that the Revision petitioner/accused obtained a loan from the respondent/complainant based on a pro-note and to discharge the same, the Revision Petitioner issued a cheque bearing No.006423, dated 16.02.2018 for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on Centurion Bank of Punjab Limited (now HDFC Bank), Gandhipuram Branch, Coimbatore in favour of the respondent. When he respondent presented the cheque for collection with his Banker viz., Corporation Bank, Narasipuram Branch, Coimbatore on 16.02.2018, the same was returned with an endorsement "No such account" vide return memo dated 19.02.2018. Therefore, the respondent issued a statutory notice dated 09.03.2018 calling upon the Revision Petitioner to pay the cheque amount within 15 days. The Revision Petitioner received the notice on 10.03.2018 and thereafter he did not repay the cheque amount. Hence the re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Courts below, he filed the above revision before this Hon'ble Court in Crl.R.C.No.812 of 2022. pending the revision both the petitioner and the respondent amicably settle the matter and the respondent received sum of Rs.3,00,000/- on various dates and the balance is Rs.2,00,000/- for that the petitioner taken the demand draft in favour of the respondent through Sough Indian Bank, Coimbatore Raja Street vide D.D.No.790162, dated 11.12.2024. 5. It is submitted by the respondent that since he received the cheque amount and he is willing to compound the offence. Therefore, the conviction and sentence imposed by the courts below may be set aside. It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to record this compromise memo and compound the above offence and acquit the petitioner who is convicted and sentence din C.A.No.21 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dated 18.03.2022 confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.509 of 2018 by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1 at Magisterial Level, Coimbatore dated 07.11.2020 by allowing the joint compromise petition in the above revision in Crl.R.C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....observe as under : "With regard to the progression of litigation in cheque bouncing cases, the learned Attorney General has urged this Court to frame guidelines for a graded scheme of imposing costs on parties who unduly delay compounding of the offence. It was submitted that the requirement of deposit of the costs will act as a deterrent for delayed composition, since at present, free and easy compounding of offences at any stage, however belated, gives an incentive to the drawer of the cheque to delay settling the cases for years. An application for compounding made after several years not only results in the system being burdened but the complainant is also deprived of effective justice. In view of this submission, we direct that the following guidelines be followed:- THE GUIDELINES (i) In the circumstances, it is proposed as follows: (a) That directions can be given that the Writ of Summons be suitably modified making it clear to the accused that he could make an application for compounding of the offences at the first or second hearing of the case and that if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the court without imposi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (iv)Procedure for trial of cases under Chapter XVII of the Act has normally to be summary. The discretion of the Magistrate under second proviso to Section 143, to hold that it was undesirable to try the case summarily as sentence of more than one year may have to be passed, is to be exercised after considering the further fact that apart from the sentence of imprisonment, the Court has jurisdiction under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. to award suitable compensation with default sentence under Section 64 IPC and with further powers of recovery under Section 431 Cr.P.C. With this approach, prison sentence of more than one year may not be required in all cases. (v) Since evidence of the complaint can be given on affidavit, subject to the Court summoning the person giving affidavit and examining him and the bank's slip being prima facie evidence of the dishonor of cheque, it is unnecessary for the Magistrate to record any further preliminary evidence. Such affidavit evidence can be read as evidence at all stages of trial or other proceedings. The manner of examination of the person giving affidavit can be as per Section 264 Cr.P.C. The scheme is to follow summary procedure ex....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e N.I. Act is very clear and is no more resintegra and the offences under the N.I. Act can be compounded even at any stage of the proceedings. He submits that in terms of the aforesaid law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the parties may be permitted to compound the offence and the conviction of the petitioner be set aside. 20. Per contra, Mr.A.Gopinath, the learned Govt. Advocate (crl.side) who appeared for the State and assisted this Court in the matter, has vehemently opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner and submits that the Revision Petitioner has already been convicted by the learned trial court and the conviction order had already been upheld by the Appellate Court in the appeal. 21. The learned Govt. Advocate (crl.side) also further submitted that the appeal has been rejected on merit and the Revision Petitioner was convicted, then where the parties or any one of them can be permitted to place compromise and to get the order of acquittal from the Court is the question. He further submitted that the present case is nothing, but a gross misuse of the process of law and thus sentence cannot be compounded on the basis o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Court to which he is committed, or as the case may be, before which the appeal is to be heard. 6) A High Court or Court of Session acting in the exercise of its powers of revision under Section 401 may allow any person to compound any offence which such person is competent to compound under this section. 7) No offence shall be compounded if the accused is, by reason of a previous conviction, liable either to enhanced punishment or to a punishment of a different kind for such offence. 8) The composition of an offence under this section shall have the effect of an acquittal of the accused with whom the offence has been compounded. 9) No offence shall be compounded except as provided by this section. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act :' "Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable." 25. I have to refer the compromise deed which is on the record for proper adjudication :- "JOINT COMPROMISE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT FILED UNDER SECTION 147 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y as provided by the statute. It is also well settled that if an effective, alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its inherent power, especially when the Revision Petitioner may not have availed of that remedy. The power can be exercised by the High Court to secure the ends of justice, prevent abuse of the process of any court and to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code or Act, depending upon the facts of the given case. This Court can always take note of any miscarriage of justice and prevent the same by exercising its power. These powers are neither limited, nor curtailed by any other provision of the Code or Act. However, such inherent powers are to be exercised sparingly and with caution 27. In the instant case, it is true that the appeal was dismissed and the conviction and sentence was upheld by the appellate court, but it cannot be lost sight of the fact that this Court has power to intervene in exercise of its power only with a view to do the substantial justice or to avoid a miscarriage and the spirit of compromise arrived at between the parties. This is perfectly justified and legal too. 28. I h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... relevant. Here, the Revision Petitioner has attempted to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. 33. I am not in agreement that when the adjudication of a criminal offence has reached to the state of revisional level, there cannot be any compromise without permission of the court in all case including the offence punishable under 'N.I. Act' or the offence mentioned in Table-1 (one) can be compounded only if High Court or Court of Sessions grants permission for such purpose. The Court presently, concerned with an offence punishable under 'N.I. Act'. 34. It is evident that the permissibility of the compounding of an offence is linked to the perceived seriousness of the offence and the nature of the remedy provided. On this point I can refer to the following extracts from an academic commentary [Cited from : K.N.C. Pillai, R.V. Kelkar's Criminal Procedure, 5th Edition : "17.2 - compounding of offences - A crime is essentially a wrong against the society and the State. Therefore, any compromise between the accused person and the individual victim of the crime should not absolve the accused from criminal responsibility. However, where the offences are ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tting value, but, where this is not so, and the building has never been let out and is being used in a manner where the question of fixing its standard rent does not arise, it would be permissible to fix its reasonable rent without regard to the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. This view will, in our opinion, give proper effect to the non-obstante clause in clause (b) with due regard to its other provision that the letting value should be "reasonable" 36. The expression 'special law' means a provision of law, which is not applicable generally but which applies to a particular or specific subject or class of subjects. Section 41 of Indian Penal Code stands on the same footing and defines the phrase special law. In this connection I would like to quote the well accepted proposition of law emerging from various observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in different decisions as a gist of the principle and it can be summarised as under: "When a special law or a statute is applicable to a particular subject, then the same would prevail over a general law with regard to the very subject, is the accepted principle in the field of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mended by the Banking,Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instrument Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 wherein a new Chapter XVII was incorporated for penalties in case of dishonour of cheques due to insufficiency of funds in the account of the drawer of the cheque. These provisions were incorporated with a view to encourage the culture of use of cheques and enhancing the credibility of the instrument. The existing provisions in the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1981, namely Section 138 to 142 in ChapterXVII have been found deficient in dealing with dishonour of cheques. Notonly the punishment provided in the Act has proved to be inadequate, theprocedure prescribed for the courts to deal with such matters has beenfound to be cumbersome. The Courts are unable to dispose of such casesexpeditiously in a time bound manner in view of the procedure contained in the Act. 2. A large number of cases are reported to be pending under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in various courts in the country. Keeping in view the large number of complaints under the saidAct, pending in various courts, a Working Group was constituted to review Section 138 of the Negotiable I....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Act is not only an offence qua property but it is also of the nature of an economic offence, though not covered in the list of statutes enacted in reference to Section 468 of Cr.P.C. Thus, the parties, in reference to offence under Section 138 N.I. Act read with Section 147 of the said Act are at liberty to compound the matter at any stage even after the dismissal of the proceedings. 43. In the instant case, the problem herein is with the tendency of litigants to belatedly choose compounding as a means to resolve their dispute, furthermore, the arguments on behalf of the Govt. Advocate (crl.side) on the fact that unlike Section 320 Cr.P.C., Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act provides no explicit guidance as to what stage compounding can or cannot be done and whether compounding can be done at the instance of the complainant or with the leave of the court. 44. I am also conscious of the view that judicial endorsement of the above quoted guidelines as given in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra) could be seen as an act of judicial law making and therefore an intrusion into the legislative domain. It must be kept in mind that Section 147 of the Act does not carry ....