Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2024 (12) TMI 1533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Counsel for the assessee filed an Affidavit which is reproduced as under: 3. Going over the affidavit and the principle led down by the apex court in a catena of decision that a case should be decided on merit not on technical issue, the delay is here by condoned. To Date - 29/11/2028 The Assistant Registrar I.T.A.T., Kolkata 225C, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700 020 Ref.: PAN-AALCS4233R/A.Y. 2010-11 Sub.: Request for Condonation of delay. Respected Sir/Madam, With due respect we would like to inform your Goodself that an order u/s 250 of the Act was passed on 26/07/2023 and the due date for filing appeal on or before the ITAT, Kolkata was 25th September, 2023. However, the appeal couldn't be filed within t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0/-. Again notices along with requisitions were issued to the assessee, but there was not compliance as a result of which, the undisclosed commission income on such accommodation entries @1.0% as per prevailing market rate worked out to Rs. 87,86590/- and the same is added back to the total income of the assessee as undisclosed commission income. 4. The assessee challenged the impugned order before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein the appeal of the assessee has been partly allowed by observing that the estimation of 1% to be quite reasonable especially when the director of the assessee company has himself admitted to the fact that only accommodation entries are passed by the assessee. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied the assessee preferred the appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e department. We have gone through the order passed by the NFAC for AY 2011-112 against the same assessee and fined that in the said assessment year the Ld. CIT(A) has directed the AO to take the percentage @ 0.15% and not @ 1% as admitted by him. The operative portion of the said order is thus: DECISION Ground no 1 is as: "That, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO erred in adding commission of Rs 13,78,679/- i.e. @ 1 percent instead of 0.10 percent to 0.15 percent which was already been accepted by the investigation wing." It is seen that while passing the Assessment Order, the AO has made an addition of Commission income @ 1% to the total income. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Director of the appellan....