Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (2) TMI 385

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was issued. The prayer in the present petition also seeks direction to the Respondent-The Commissioner of Customs to pay storage charges to Central Warehousing Cooperation, IGI Airport. 3. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Show Cause Notice has not been issued within the period of 6 months from the date of appraisement of the said goods. 4. When the matter was listed on 11th December 2024, the Customs Department informed the Court that the Order-in-Original has now been passed in the case. The said Order-in-Original dated 29th November 2024 was then handed over to the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner and then brought on record. 5. The brief background of this case is that the Petitioner arrived from Dubai in Terminal-3, IGI Airpor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he present case and therefore the goods are liable to be returned. 10. Mr. Naushad, ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the SCN could be even oral as per the first proviso to Section 124 of the Act. In the application for release of detained goods, the Petitioner has signed an undertaking that he does not want a written SCN or even a personal hearing. 11. It is further submitted that insofar as gold is concerned, the discretion vests with the authorities whether to release or not release the gold articles, insofar as the other articles are concerned, the same have been permitted to be redeemed by paying a sum of Rs. 85,000/-. 12. The Court has considered the matter. The main plank of the Respondent's submission is on the basis of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etc.-No order confiscating any goods or imposing any penalty on any person shall be made under this Chapter unless the owner of the goods or such person- (a) is given a notice in [writing with the prior approval of the officer of Customs not below the rank of [an Assistant Commissioner of Customs], informing] him of the grounds on which it is proposed to confiscate the goods or to impose a penalty; (b) is given an opportunity of making a representation in writing within such reasonable time as may be specified in the notice against the grounds of confiscation or imposition of penalty mentioned therein; and (c) is given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter: Provided that the notice referred to in clause (a) and the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Court recently in Mohammad Zaid Saleem vs. The Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General) [W.P.(C) No. 2595/2019], has held clearly that if a SCN is not given within six months of the seizure, the goods would be liable to be released. The relevant portion of the above stated judgment is extracted below: "Before parting with this petition, it is pertinent to note that the matters in issue in the present matter are squarely covered by decision in the case of Chaganlal Gainmull v. Collector of Central Excise, where it was held that if the show cause notice was not issued within six months from the date of seizure, the consequence would be that the person from whom the gold was seized would become entitled to its return. Although the aspec....