Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (2) TMI 403

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessment order for want of issue of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act. 3. Since the legal issue taken by the assessee hits at the very validity of the assessment order, therefore, the same is taken first for adjudication. 4. At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for reopening of the assessment, contents of which are reproduced for the sake of ready reference: "Reasons for reopening of the assessment in case of MS. SUNCITY NIKETAN PVT. LTD. PAN: AAPCS4157E for A. Y. 2013-14 u/s. 147 of the Act. The assessee filed its return of income on 25/09/2013 for the A. Y. 2013- 14 declaring total income of Rs. 3,950/- Processing us.143[1] of the Act was completed on 14/04/2014 accepting the returned income. No scrutiny assessment has been made in this case. In the case, on the basis of enquiry and information in the possession of the undersigned which has been received from ADIT(Inv.), Unit-3[2], Kolkata vide letter dated 27/02/2019 wherein it has been stated that as per credible information held with them that M/s. Suncity Niketan Pvt Ltd, M/s. Manikala Dealmark Pvt. Ltd., M/s.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ections against the said reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, the relevant part of which is reproduced as under: "c) Our assessment for assessment year 2012-13 for also reopened on the basis of the same set of information and an order u/s 143(3)/147 passed on 18/12/2019. A copy of the said order wherein the Assessing Officer has duly accepted our replies is attached for your ready reference. d) Please be informed that we are in business of Investment and Finance and the Nature of transactions are that of purchase and sale of investments. e) The said bank account is duly disclosed in our income tax return and all transactions are reflected in the regular books of accounts. f) The said receipts are genuine business receipt of the assessee whereby we have had sold our investments acquired in previous year to the said companies and the said receipts are duly accounted for and recorded in the books of accounts of the assessee. g) We would also like to draw your kind attention to the recent judgement by "D" Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in Adbhut Vinimay Private Limited versus ITO, Ward 4(3), Kolkata (ITA No.2484/Kol/28....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the submissions of the assessee, no additions were made by the Assessing Officer and the returned income was accepted by the Assessing Officer. The ld. counsel has duly demonstrated that for the year under consideration, the assessee had filed objections against the reopening of the assessment. He has also demonstrated that for the identical reasons, the assessment for immediately preceding year i.e. assessment year 2012-13 was reopened and the Assessing Officer did not make any addition on the same issue in an order passed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act dated 18.12.2019. At this stage, the ld. counsel has further invited our attention to the impugned assessment order dated 31.03.2022 to show that the Assessing Officer totally skipped the aforesaid facts in the assessment order. He did not decide the objections filed by the assessee and even failed to discuss about the filing of the same and that the additions have been made in a summarily manner without any discussion. He has demonstrated that the Assessing Officer has totally failed to mention as to the alleged nature of the transactions done by the assessee and as to from whom the assessee had received any alleged cash credits. H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d not bring out any evidence on the file to show that any notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was ever issued to the assessee. The assessee having duly taken the aforesaid plea that no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued to the assessee and there is a complete silence about it in the assessment order, which duly proves that no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act has ever been issued to the assessee in this case. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'ACIT vs. Hotel Blue Moon' reported in 321 ITR 362 (SC) held that the issue of notice u/s 143(2) is sine qua non to assume jurisdiction to proceed with the assessment in a case. The assessment carried out without issuing any notice u/s 143(2) of the Act in such cases will be bad in law. Reliance in this respect can be placed on the decision of Jurisdictional Calcutta High Court in the case of 'PCIT vs. Nopany & Sons' reported in [2022] 136 taxmann.com 414 (Calcutta) and in the case of 'PCIT vs. Cosmat Traders (P) Ltd.' reported in [2023] 146 taxmann.com 207 (Calcutta). 6.2 Further, the issue is also covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Dart Infrabuild (P) Ltd. in IT Appeal No.10 of 2022 order dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee in response to notice under section 148, the, entire procedure adopted for escaped assessment, shall not be valid." 15. In a subsequent judgment in CIT v. Salarpur Cold Storage (P.) Ltd. [2014] 50 taxmann.com 105 (All), it was held as under: "10. Section 292BB of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 2008 with effect from April 1, 2008. Section 282BB of the Act provides a deeming fiction. The deeming fiction is to the effect that once the assessee has appeared in any proceeding or cooperated In any enquiry relating to an assessment or reassessment, it shall be deemed that any notice under the provisions of the Act, which is required to be served on the assessee, has been duly served upon him in time in accordance with the provisions of the Act The assessee is precluded from taking any objection in any proceeding or enquiry that the notice was (i) not served upon him ; or ii) not served upon him in time ; or (iii) served upon him in an improper manner. IN other words, once the deeming fiction comes into operation, the assessee is precluded from raising a challenge about the service of a notice, service within time or service in an improper manner. The prov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notice issued u/s 148 of the Act and the Officer had also noted that the same would be considered for completing of assessment, would show that the AO has the duty of issuing the notice under Section 143(3) to lead on to the passing of the assessment. In the circumstances, with no notice issued u/s 143(3) and there being no waiver, there is no justifiable ground to accept the view of the Tribunal that there was a waiver of right of notice to be issued u/s 143(2) of the Act." 18. As already noticed, the decision of this Court in Vision Inc. (supra) proceeded on a different set of facts. In that case, there was a clear finding of the Court that service of the notice had been effected on the Assessee under Section 143 (2) of the Act. As already further noticed, the legal position regarding Section 292BB has already been made explicit in the aforementioned decisions of the Allahabad High Court. That provision would apply insofar as failure of "service" of notice was concerned and not with regard to failure to "issue" notice. In other words, the failure of the AO, in re-assessment proceedings, to issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, prior to finalising the re-assessmen....