2025 (2) TMI 280
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....jan Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents along with Ms. Suhani Mathur and Mr. Shivang Chawla PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present writ petition is filed by the Petitioner-Sandeep Sandha under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the Order....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Petitioner only on the personal hearing conducted on 25th September, 2024. 5. The grievance of the Petitioner is that though the SCN is of 2019, a proper personal hearing was conducted only on 25th September, 2024. 6. Further it is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner that he was not provided sufficient time to file a reply on the said personal hearing dated 25th September, 2024. 7. A l....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....adequate opportunity was given, however, the Petitioner did not avail of the same. 10. Heard. The record of proceedings dated 25th September, 2024 shows that the Petitioner was given an opportunity to file detailed submissions within five weeks. The said order is extracted below: The Petitioner, however, chose not to file the written submissions or reply. Merely two letters were filed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y. 15. Under such circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that this is not an extraordinary case for exercise of writ jurisdiction by this Court. It is, however, clarified that none of the questions of law raised have been gone into by the Court. All contentions are left open. 16. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with the liberty to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate appella....


TaxTMI