Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Court Upholds Director's Resignation as Valid Defense Against Cheque Dishonor Case Under NI Act Sections 138/141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC ruled in favor of petitioner, quashing criminal proceedings under Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138/141. Director's unilateral resignation was deemed valid from date of company's receipt, despite non-filing of Form 32 or ROC notification. Court emphasized that filing statutory forms is company secretary's duty, not director's responsibility. Resignation's effectiveness under Companies Act Section 168(2) occurs upon company's receipt or specified date, whichever later. Petitioner's March 14, 2020 resignation (delivered March 16, 2020) preceded dishonored cheque, eliminating vicarious liability. Court held criminal proceedings would constitute judicial process abuse, noting criminal law cannot be tool for settling personal disputes.....