2024 (12) TMI 1443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... THE PETITIONER: G NARENDRA CHETTY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ORDER (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order vide GSTIN:37AIQPS1926D1Z0, dated 05.06.2024 passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short "the GST Act"] for the period 2017-2018, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. This as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erred to as "C.B.I.C."), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN number would be non-est and invalid. 5. A Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s. Cluster Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 179 (A.P.), on the basis of the circular, dated 23.12.2019, bearing No.128/47/2019-GST, issued by the C.B.I.C., had held that non-mention ....