Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 2861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent : Smt. Sunita Kejriwal, CIT DR ORDER PER BENCH These appeals by the assessee have been preferred against the order of CIT(A), New Delhi dated 5.2.2009 in Appeal No. 92/07-08 for AY 1998-99. 2. These appeals were initially fixed for hearing on 29.3.2012 and since then adjournments have been sought by the counsel for the assessee. Thereafter, the appeal was fixed for hearing on 5.10.201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D' in the case of CIT vs Multiplan India (P) Ltd. 38 ITD 320 observed that the provisions of Rule 19 state that mere issue of notice could not by itself mean that the appeal had been admitted. This rule only clarifies the position. There might be various reasons with the appellant to remain absent at the time of hearing. One of the reasons might also be a desire or absence of need to prosecute the....