Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Arbitral award sum carries 18% interest from date of award to payment unless stated otherwise - inclusive of pre-award interest.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The SC held that u/s 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the 'sum' awarded by the arbitral tribunal, whether inclusive of interest or not from the date of cause of action to the date of award, would carry further interest at 18% from the date of award to the date of payment, unless the award directs otherwise. The arbitral tribunal has power to grant pre-award, pendente lite, and post-award interest. The 'sum' directed to be paid u/s 31(7)(b) is inclusive of interest pendente lite. The appellant's contention that the arbitrator became functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to issue clarification was rejected as the SC had permitted the respondent to seek clarification. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the HC order.....