TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (12) TMI 1076
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Learned Advocates Appeared in the Case: For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Kar, Senior Advocate Ms. I. Tripathy, Advocate Mr. D. Behera, Advocate Mr. R. Patra, Advocate Mr. A.N. Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Sunil Mishra, Advocate (Standing Counsel) JUDGMENT PER ARINDAM SINHA, J. 1. Mr. Kar, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., the order was made on 26th September, 2024, being 7th day from date of service of the notice on the penalty payable. This is the requirement in sub-section (3) of section 129. He then draws attention to clauses (c) and (d) under sub-section (1) in section 169. The clauses are reproduced below. "169 (c) by sending a communication to his e-mail address provided at the time of registration....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s made by e-mail sent on 26th September, 2024 at 22:41 hours to e-mail address of petitioner. We have looked at the print. Contents of the print talks about attached file but there is no indication of any attachment. This, added to admission on part of revenue that the order was dated 27th September, 2024 as appearing from annexure-1 does not inspire us to conclude that the order was made on 26th ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ken to be the proposal and communication of it can only be complete, when it comes to knowledge of the person against whom it is made. Revenue has not been able to satisfy us about the communication made on 26th September, 2024, by mail sent to e-mail address of petitioner on fulfilling the requirement under section 169 (1) (c). Communication of the order was complete the next day, when it was upl....