Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Validity of Assessment u/s 153C: Reckoning the Limitation Period

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cent order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that dealt with the crucial issue of determining the appropriate assessment years for initiating proceedings u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in cases involving search and seizure operations. The case highlights the importance of correctly identifying the starting point for calculating the six-year limitation period prescribed u/s 153C. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the six assessment years immediately preceding it would be AY 2018-19 to AY 2022-23. * The assessee relied on various judicial precedents, including the decisions of the coordinate Benches of the ITAT, to support their contentions. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue supported the orders passed by the lower authorities, contending that they were in accordance with the law. COURT DISCUSSION....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the assessment year relevant for the previous year in which the search was conducted would be AY 2023-24, and the six assessment years immediately preceding it would be AY 2018-19 to AY 2022-23. Consequently, the assessment for AY 2021-22 should have been carried out by issuing a notice u/s 153C, and not u/s 143(2). ANALYSIS AND DECISION The ITAT concluded that the assessment order dated 29-12-2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....zure operations, must be strictly adhered to. The Tribunal relied on the coordinate Bench decision in Jasjit Singh's case, which had extensively analyzed the interplay between Sections 153A and 153C and the proviso to Section 153C. The order highlights the importance of correctly determining the starting point for calculating the limitation period u/s 153C. It aligns with the judicial precede....