Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (12) TMI 399

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed dealer on the rolls of the 5th respondent for the purposes of payment of GST. During the assessment year 2017-2018, and in particular, during the period from July 2017 to March 2018, the appellant received various inward supplies of goods, both inter-state and intrastate. For the inter-state inward supplies, on which IGST (Integrated Goods and Services Tax) was paid by the supplier, the appellant had to avail input tax credit by resorting to a procedure whereby he had to show the IGST amount paid by the supplier, as the IGST paid by him in the Form GSTR-2A generated by him, and thereafter, if there was no outward supply on which IGST had to be paid by him he had to show the same IGST amount as Credit available in the Form GSTR 3A and then split the IGST amount into the CGST (Central Goods and Services Tax) and SGST (State Goods and Services Tax) components in the said Form 3A before utilising the same for the purposes of payment of outward taxes. In the instant case, however, on receipt of the IGST paid inward supplies from outside the State, the appellant, instead of showing the IGST component in the eligible credit details in Form GSTR-3B, inadvertently showed the IGST compo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the 3rd respondent, and Smt. Resmitha Ramachandran the learned Government Pleader for the State. 7. During the course of the hearing, we have been shown a copy of an order dated 14.12.2023 passed by Shri. Hareendran K, IRS, Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, East Division-6, Bengaluru, which considered an identical issue regarding the availment of input tax credit as CGST and SGST instead of IGST. In the said case, the Assessing Authority had issued a notice alleging that there had been a wrong availment of input tax credit since the IGST amounts paid by the assessee, and in respect of which he ought to have taken credit as such, had not been shown separately as IGST but had been split by the assessee into the CGST and SGST components while taking credit. On the assessee bringing the said facts to the notice of the Officer, the findings of the Officer were as follows: "23. Issue 2: Wrong availment of ITC as CGST (27,000/-) and SGST (27,000/-) instead of IGST -: During the course of verification and reconciliation of ITC register, it was noticed that the taxpayer had availed input tax credit of Rs. 27,000/- as CGST and 27,000/- as SGST instead of IGST for a supply received ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T and SGST, instead of IGST, in the month of April 2019 for a supply received from a service provider located in Maharashtra. In the instant case, there is no dispute regarding the eligibility of the input tax credit claimed by the noticee; but the allegation pertains to the noticee erroneously availing the input tax credit under incorrect heads, specifically CGST & SGST credit availed instead of IGST credit. 27. In accordance with Section 49 (2) of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, the input tax credit, as assessed by the registered person in their return, is credited to their electronic credit ledger. The utilization of the electronic credit ledger for discharging payments related to output tax is governed by the provisions outlined in Sections 49 (4) and 49 (5) of the GST Act. Section 49 (4) and 49 (5) is reproduced below; Section 49 (4): The amount available in the electronic credit ledger may be used for making any payment towards output tax under this Act or under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act in such manner and subject to such conditions 3 [and restrictions] within such time as may be prescribed. Section 49 (5) The amount of input tax credit available i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... electronic credit ledger, under the heads of IGST, CGST and SGST taken together, that has to be considered for calculation of interest under rule 88B of CGST Rules and for determining as to whether the balance in the electronic credit ledger has fallen below the amount of wrongly availed input tax credit of IGST, and to what extent the balance in electronic credit ledger has fallen below the said amount of wrongly availed credit. Thus, in the cases where IGST credit has been wrongly availed and subsequently reversed on a certain date, there will not be any interest liability under sub-section (3) of section 50 of CGST Act if, during the time period starting from such availment and up to such reversal, the balance of input tax credit (ITC) in the electronic credit ledger, under the heads of IGST, CGST and SGST taken together, has never fallen below the amount of such wrongly availed ITC, even if available balance of IGST credit in electronic credit ledger individually falls below the amount of such wrongly availed IGST credit. However, when the balance of ITC, under the heads of IGST, CGST and SGST of electronic credit ledger taken together, falls below such wrongly availed amount ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts the correct view of the procedural law in this regard, but more importantly, demonstrates that revenue officials, even at the level of Assistant Commissioner, who are often the first point of contact between an assessee and the revenue department, are capable of rendering timely and effective justice in our country which is known for its huge backlog of cases. At a time when the justice dispensation system is looking for ways and means to reduce litigation generally, and especially in the field of taxation where delays can affect the nation's economy, orders such as the one extracted above come as a welcome breath of fresh air, and are to be duly appreciated and encouraged. It needs no gainsaying that an expeditious disposal of cases, especially those involving procedural aspects of taxation, is the need of the hour so as to ensure fairness and certainty in tax administration. 9. We find that on the facts in the instant case, the notice issued to the appellant, and the demand confirmed against him, were in proceedings initiated under Section 73 of the GST Act. The said provisions are attracted only when it appears to a proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short....