AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (12) TMI 287
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tc. They are also providing the exempted services and had availed the option under sub-clause (ii) of sub rule 3 of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. During the audit of their records, department observed that the appellant has Cenvat credit of Rs. 1,11,22,936/- during the Financial Year 2010-11 and of Rs. 1,42,31,299/- during 2012-13. The Cenvat credit on the said amounts have been worked out at Rs. 28,42,027/- and Rs. 32,22,660/- for the respective financial year. However, department has worked out the same at Rs. 97,67,158/- and Rs. 36,32,862/- (Rs.20,17,121 + Rs.16,15,741/-) respectively. Based on these observations, it is alleged that the appellant has short paid an amount equivalent to Cenvat credit attributable to exempted ser....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....not liable for proportionate reversal. Total Cenvat credit availed in the Year 2010-11 is Rs. 1,11,22,936/- out of which substantial amount of Rs. 78,86,394/- pertains to Management Consultancy Services. Hence, the substantial demand on this account is liable to be set aside. 3.1 With respect to the alleged short payment of Rs. 3,87,671/- for the period from April 2012 to June 2012, it is submitted that the figures taken by the department for calculating the said shortcoming do not tally with the figures reflected in the appellant's record. Learned Chartered Accountant further mentioned that during this period, an amount of Rs. 4,46,651/- has been included in the credit availed of Rs. 15,77,123/- despite the fact that the former amount per....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nputs used in providing taxable as well as exempted services like Food Sale in Restaurants, Boarding and Lodging facilities of guests etc. (iv) Sub-clause (ii) of Rule 6 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 has been complied with by the appellant. (v) While applying Rule 6 (3A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 appellant had reversed the proportionate Cenvat Credit of Rs. 28,42,027/- for the Year 2010-11 with an intimation thereof to the department vide letter dated 30.06.2011 and has also reversed the proportionate Cenvat credit of Rs. 28,32,413/- for the Year 2011-12 under intimation to the department vide letter dated 29.06.2012. 6. We also observe that the period in question has been divided into three vis-à-vis the respective dem....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....specifically allowed even if it is partially used in providing the exempted services. The rule clarifies that the credit taken on Management Consultancy Service is not liable for proportionate reversal under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. We accordingly hold that the amount of Cenvat credit was not supposed to be reversed vis-à-vis Management Consultancy Services. The original adjudicating authority also in Para 4.4.1 in sub-para 2 has held that appellant to be entitled to avail 100% credit of the same irrespective of their utilization in taxable or non-taxable service during the period under question. However, relief has been denied as the said sub-rule (5) was omitted vide Notification No. 3/2011. However, we observe that the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r both kind of services. The said argument of the appellant is not sustainable. The adjudicating authority in Para 4.6 of the order under challenge has held that use of Wi-fi Service by its very nature is not restricted to providing only taxable services. The use of Wi-fi Services in providing number of exempted services has not been denied by the assessee. Rather the assessee themselves had exercised the option under Rule 6 (3)(ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for payment of proportionate amount attributable to exempted services as they were not in a position to identify a particular input service with a particular output service. In the light of the said admitted facts, it has been held that there is no justification in showing use of a p....