Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (12) TMI 305

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e that a common order can dispose of these petitions. 3. Mr Kamat, learned senior advocate for the petitioners, states on instructions that relief in terms of prayer clause (a) is not being pressed given the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated 07 November 2024 in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Private Limited (Review Petition No. 400 of 2021). 4. Mr Kamat, however, submits that the impugned order dated 28 June 2024 made by the 1st respondent grossly violates the principles of natural justice and fair play. He submits that the petitioners, from October 2023 onwards, have been requesting the furnishing of documents, among other things, relating to 3 seizure inspections and also panchnama etc. After repeated requests, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....here is nothing like a mere technical breach of natural justice. 7. We get a prima facie impression from the materials on record that the petitioners were most reluctant to file even a reply to the show cause notice and constantly sought time to file such a reply. Most times, the time was granted, and adjudication of the show cause notice was deferred. Inspection was also offered to the petitioners. Instead of raising a defence, if any, the Petitioner focused entirely on developing a case to eventually allege a failure of natural justice. In any event, we do not propose to conclude the issue of breach of natural justice at this stage. However, we would like to observe that this is not some case where the breach is apparent on the face of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....verments in the Petition are, therefore, misleading. 11. At the highest, the petitioners could have pleaded that an alternate remedy is provided by law. Still, the same is not efficacious for the reasons now argued by Mr Kamat, learned counsel for the petitioners. However, making an omnibus and misleading statement about no alternate remedy cannot be appreciated. 12. In Oberoi Constructions Ltd vs. Union of India and Ors. and connected matters [Writ Petition (L) No. 33260 of 2023], we summarised several decisions concerning the exhaustion of alternate remedies. We noted the increased tendency to rush to this Court, bypassing the statutory remedies available. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that such a tendency should not be encouraged. The....