Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (11) TMI 1209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of Rs. 1,80,00,000/- towards the loan received by the appellant and treated as bogus loan and added back to the income of the appellant. 2. The learned Assessing Officer has not followed the due process of law, and merely passed the order in a mechanical manner and the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in passing the ex-Parte Order and upholding the order passed by the Assessing Officer without considering the circumstances and facts of the case. 3. The brief facts are that the return of income for A.Y 2013-14 was filed on 31/03/2015 declaring total income at Rs. NIL. The appellant is a Real Estate Developer. Subsequently, the case was reopened by serving notice u/s.148 on 07.06.2016 after recording the reasons f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Parmar who is accountant for 30 companies of Praveen jain is made part of the order as annexure 1. He clearly mentions that Praveen Jain is providing accommodation entries to various assessees. The statement includes names of all 5 entities from whom accommodation entries are taken by assessee in AY 2013-14. iv) Statement recorded of Mr. Uttam Hinger is made part of assessment order as annexure B. He is brother in law of Praveen Jain and works with Praveen Jain. He has given statement of oath telling that none of the entities run by Mr. Praveen Jain are genuine in nature. v) The relevant extracts of the said statement of Rakesh Doshi recorded u/s. 131 of the I.T. Act, 1961 during the course of the survey action in his case on 25/03/2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at ITR of the above entities was not produced by the assessee. Hence, Ld. Counsel submitted that since, assessee has discharged its onus and AO has not done any enquiry, the addition is not sustainable. Per contra Ld. DR relied upon the order of authorities below. 7. Upon careful consideration, we note that the addition loans as bogus cash credit has been done solely on the basis of information received from Investigation wing regarding the search in case of Praveen Jain and bogus companies being operated by him. Assessee has duly submitted the loan confirmation and bank statement. The AO has not even bothered to issued notice to the concerned parties. He has put the onus of providing the ITR of these parties to the assessee. In our consid....