Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1974 (6) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,000 was the appellant's income from undisclosed sources was perverse in the sense that no reasonable man could come to it on the materials on record ? (3) Whether the said conclusion was based on conjectures, surmise or suspicion and on a failure to consider the relevant evidence on record ?" As this reference is capable of being disposed of on a short point, namely, whether the sum of Rs. 1,38,000 as income from undisclosed sources can be assessed for the assessment year 1947-48 or not, it is unnecessary for us to go into the facts in detail. For the assessment year 1947-48, the relevant accounting year is the calendar year 1946. The Income-tax Officer, upon scrutiny of the material before him, assessed the assessee to the total amoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... If for the assessment year 1947-48, the sum of Rs. 1,38,000 as income from undisclosed sources cannot be regarded as part of the income, then naturally question No. 1 has to be answered in favour of the assessee. On January 19, 1946, the assessee made a declaration in the form prescribed under section 6 of the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Ordinance, 1946, being Ordinance No. 3 of 1946. As shown by particulars in item 14 of the declaration she has encashed 238 notes of Rs. 1,000 each. While assessing the assessee for the assessment year 1947-48, the Income-tax Officer directly applied his mind to the question whether the sum of Rs. 2,38,000 representing 238 notes of Rs. 1,000 each was her income for the assessment year 1947....