Income Tax Case Transfers: Place of Business vs. Registered Office: Determining the Appropriate Jurisdiction for Income Tax Assessments

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nciples of natural justice were adhered to in the transfer process. ARGUMENTS PRESENTED Petitioners' Contentions: * The petitioners have their registered offices in Coimbatore and do not carry out any business activities within Kolkata's jurisdiction. * The transfer would cause them personal difficulties, increased litigation costs, and inconvenience due to their age and the availability of documents in Coimbatore. * Their replies objecting to the transfer were not considered, and no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before issuing the transfer notification, violating principles of natural justice. * They relied on cases from the Bombay and Calcutta High Courts emphasizing the need for an opportunity of persona....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ailed. * An opportunity for personal hearing was also provided on 02.01.2024, but the petitioners failed to appear. * The court held that even if there was a lapse in providing a personal hearing, it would not alter the final decision to transfer the cases, as the material seized warranted such a transfer. ANALYSIS AND DECISION The court concluded that: * When incriminating materials are seized based on an assessee's place of business, even if the registered office is situated elsewhere, it is appropriate to conduct the assessment through the circle where the materials were seized, irrespective of the registered office's location. * Section 127 of the Income Tax Act empowers the transfer of cases from one place to another ....