Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (5) TMI 1398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and material required for this ground are already available on record. Placing reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC Ltd. 229 ITR 383(SC) and CIT vs. Sinhad Technical Education Society 397 ITR 344 (SC) the ld. AR submitted that legal issue were facts exists on record can be taken as additional ground at any stage of proceedings even before the Tribunal first time. 3. Replying to the above the ld. Senior DR strongly opposed to the admission of additional ground. 4. The assessee seeks to raise additional legal ground which reads as under: "That under the facts and circumstances, the proceedings initiated u/s. 147/148 of I.T. Act are unwarranted and without jurisdiction against, at the most, corr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ound in search of a 3rd party, the provisions of Sec. 153C are applicable which excludes the application of Sec. 147 / 148. The scope of Sec. 147 / 148 viz a viz 153C are different Sec. 147 is applicable where there is any information other than taken out from the seized material in search of a 3rd party while, Sec. 153C is to be invoked where the reasstt. is proposed on the basis of incriminating material found in search on a 3rd party. Hence, on the basis of seized material, the impugned proceedings could had been initiated only us. 153C and not u/s. 147 / 148, hence whole proceedings are liable to be quashed CASE LAWS Saurashtra Color Tones Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO ITA No. 6276 / Del / 2018 Dtd. 22.01.20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "Reassessment - validity - reassessment on the basis of incriminating material found in search of 3rd party - provisions of section 153C are applicable which exclude the application of SS. 147 and 148 - hence notice issued under section 148 and proceedings under S. 147 are illegal and void ab initio - A.O. having not followed procedure under S. 153C, reassessment order was rightly quashed by CIT(A)" 7. The learned Senior DR has also placed written submissions on the strength of order of ITAT Ahmedabad in the case Shailesh S. Patel vs. ITO (2018) 97 taxmann.com 570 and order of ITAT Pune in the case of Sushil Kumar S Nadkarni vs. ITO order dated 29.11.2013 and submitted that a conjoining reading of section 147 and 153C shows that ju....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s juncture it is pertinent to take cognizance of order of ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of Saurashtra Color Tones Pvt. Ltd. (supra) wherein the co-ordinate bench adjudicating the identical legal issue held has follows:- "Therefore, there was no justification for the A.O. to have been initiated proceedings us. 147 / 148 of the I.T. Act. The correct course of action would have been to proceed against the assessee under section 153C of the I. T. Act. Therefore initiation of reassessment proceedings w/s. 147 / 148 of the I.T. Act is wholly invalid, void and bad in law" 10. On careful perusal of orders of co-ordinate bench in the case of Shailesh S. Patel (supra) and Sushil Kumar Nadkarni (supra) are not applicable to the facts of the....