Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Cash deposits during demonetization were explained, addition dropped. Director's brother's salary allowed, but not family members' salaries.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Addition u/s 68 was made for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period. Assessee submitted detailed cash sales and deposits, demonstrating all deposits were from cash sales. AO rejected, observing SBN was banned from 09.11.2016. However, as per Ordinance, prohibition on holding SBN was after 31.12.2016, not 08.11.2016. Therefore, addition u/s 68 was dismissed. Regarding salary expenditure to brother of Director, it was allowed as he is a regular key employee and salary was disclosed in returns. However, salaries to sister-in-law and wife of Director were disallowed due to lack of evidence of employment and services rendered. The ITAT partly allowed Revenue's grounds.....

PrevPreviousNextNext