Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 982

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....make Biovita for the Principal Manufacturer, namely PI Industries. The appellant cleared the goods by classifying the same under heading 3101 0099 claiming nil rate of excise duty in ER-1 Returns. However, by mistake they declared the Central Excise heading as 3105 of Central Excise Tariff in the months of June, August, September 2014 and Central Excise Heading 3808 for the month of July 2015. On realising this mistake of wrong headings the appellant vide letter dated 20.03.2017 informed the jurisdictional Central Excise Authorities about the correct classification of Biovita under heading 3101 of the Central Excise Tariff. A show cause notice dated 01.07.2017 was issued seeking to classify the goods under heading 3808 of the Central Excise Tariff classifying the goods as Plant Growth Regulator and consequently differential central excise duty was demanded along with interest. There was also a suggestion of imposing penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Both the lower authorities upheld the demand and rejected the classification claimed by the appellant. Consequently this appeal has been filed before Tribunal. 2.1 Learned cou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....crease the productivity of the soil and/or crop;" "(ab) "biostimulant" means a substance or microorganism or a combination of both whose primary function when applied to plants, seeds or rhizosphere is to stimulate physiological processes in plants and to enhance its nutrient uptake, growth, yield, nutrition efficiency, crop quality and tolerance to stress, regardless of its nutrient content, but does not include pesticides or plant growth regulators which are regulated under the Insecticide Act, 1968 (46 of 1968);" .. "(h) "Fertiliser" means any essential substance, either in straight or mixed form and derived from either inorganic, organic or mixed sources, that is used or intended to be used to provide essential plant nutrients or beneficial elements or both for the soil or for the crop or makes essential plant nutrients available to the plants either directly or by biological process or by both in the soil or plant as notified from time to time by Central Government and specified in the schedules appended to this order or as may be notified by the State Governments and includes a biostimulant and nano fertiliser. Explanation. For the purpose ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 06.04.2016. The said circular prescribed that micronutrient could not be classified under Chapter 31 as 'fertilizer'. It also relies on the fact that the appellants had in the month of July 2015 themselves classified the goods under Central Excise Tariff Heading 3808 and in the months of June, August, September-2015 classified the product under Central Excise Tariff Heading 3105 as per directions of M/s PI Industries, the principal manufacturer. It is noticed that subsequent to the impugned order, the issue regarding classification of goods between Chapter 31 and Chapter 38 was referred to the Larger Bench in the case of PI Industries (the Principal Manufacturer itself). Detailed order has been passed by Larger Bench of Tribunal in appeal no. 10081 of 2013 vide Final Order No. 25-30/2024. In the said order, different aspects of the issue have been examined. The said clarity was not available before the lower authorities. The issue involves practically same principles and same chapters. Following are some excerpts from the said decision of Larger Bench. "TARIFF ENTRIES 28. Having examined the aforesaid two products Siapton 10L and Isabion, it would be appropriate to now....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....department have to be considered. 32. The Division Bench, while referring the matter to the Larger Bench, noticed that the decision of the Tribunal in Northern Minerals would not help the appellant for the reason that in that case the product was applied to soil while in the appeals that were being heard by the Division Bench the product was directly sprayed on plants/trees. 33. The issue, therefore, that would arise for consideration is whether the mode of usage of the product through soil or foliar application is a determinative test for classifying the goods under ETI 3101 00 99 or ETI 3808 93 43. 34. ETI 3101 00 99 and ETI 3808 93 40, when read with the relevant section and Chapter Notes and the HSN Explanatory Notes, do not provide a distinction based on the mode of usage of such elements. It needs to be noted that water-soluble fertilizers are used for soil and foliar applications. 35. In this connection, it would be pertinent to refer to Unit 5: Plant Nutrition and Irrigation of the book "Floriculturist (Open Cultivation)" prescribed for NCERT Class XI. It provides that the fertilizers can be applied in solid form (broadcasting basal application an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ons where soil conditions are not favorable, it is desirable to make foliar applications of the plant nutrients. 38. It is also important to notice that plant growth regulators are also used for soil and foliar applications. The EU Explanatory Note to ETI 3808 93 90 makes it aptly clear that the plant growth regulators can be applied to the whole plant or parts of the plant or to the soil. 39. Thus, the test based on mode of application would not be a correct test. 40. It now needs to be examined whether the two products, namely, Siapton 10L and Isabion are fertilizers or plant growth regulators. 41. P.I. Industries has stated that the product Siapton 10L has amino acids alone. It has clarified that 54% of the product is pure amino acids and the remaining ingredients are peptides and micro-nutrients, which are short chain amino acids. Dr. R. Uma Shankar in his opinion dated 08.01.2013 has confirmed that amino acids and peptides can be regarded as bio-stimulants and should be treated as organic nutrients or organic fertilizers and not as classical plant growth regulators. Isagro SPA, Italy which supplied the product to P.I. Industries has specific....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aforesaid definition of "bio-stimulants" was included in the Fertilizer Order by Order dated 23.02.2021 of the Ministry, but as the Ministry has clearly expressed that bio-stimulants would exclude plant growth regulators, the definition would certainly provide guidance. 46. Fertilizers and plant growth regulators are both used in agriculture but serve different purposes. Fertilizers are substances added to the soil or plants to provide essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium that plants need to grow. They enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth by providing the necessary elements for healthy development. On the other hand, plant growth regulators are chemicals that influence plant growth and development by affecting physiological processes like cell division, elongation, and differentiation. They can regulate plant growth by promoting or inhibiting certain functions such as flowering, fruit setting, and root development. In a nutshell, fertilizers provide essential nutrients for plant growth, while plant growth regulators control specific aspects of plant growth and development. 44. Fertilizers are categorized based on the primary nut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nutrients directly to the soil or plants, which are then absorbed by the roots and utilized for various metabolic processes within the plant. (ii) Plant growth regulators function by interacting with plant hormones and signaling pathways, altering gene expression, and ultimately modifying plant growth patterns and responses. Application (i) Fertilizers are applied to ensure a consistent supply of nutrients throughout the growing season. They can be applied before planting, during growth stages, or as a foliar spray. (ii) Plant growth regulators are applied in specific concentrations and at precise timings to elicit desired responses in plants. They are used to manipulate plant growth processes at critical stages of development. Effects (i) Fertilizers enhance overall plant growth, increase crop yield, improve nutrient uptake, and support healthy plant development. (ii) Plant growth regulators can induce specific responses in plants, such as promoting flowering, delaying senescence, improving fruit quality, or enhancing stress tolerance. 50. The two products, namely, Siapton 10L and Isabion merely provide nutrie....