Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 965

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r short) pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2023-2024. 2. The short issue arising in the present appeal for our adjudication relates to denial of credit of tax deducted at source(TDS) in the intimation made to the assessee in terms of the provisions of section 143(1) of the Act. 3. The facts of the case reveal that in the intimation made to the assessee the total TDS credit claimed by the assessee was to the tune of Rs. 5,24,600/-, which was restricted to Rs. 4,07,968/- by the CPC, in proportion of the income returned to tax to that on which TDS was deducted. It was noted that while TDS of Rs. 5,24,600/-had been deducted on an income of Rs. 5,24,60,000/-, the assessee had returned income only to the tune of Rs. 4,07,96,898/- in the re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Ld.CIT(A) confirming the restriction of TDS credit as contained at paragraph Nos.6 to 6.2.6 of his order are as under: "6. DECISION: I have very carefully considered the statement of facts, grounds of appeal and the appellant's submission and proceed to dispose of the appeal accordingly. 6.1. Ground of appeal no. 2 being general in nature requires no adjudication and is therefore Dismissed. 6.2. Ground of appeal no. 1 challenges the action of the AO in restricting the TDS credit to Rs. 407,968/- as against the claim of Rs. 524,600/-. The appellant has made the following arguments: i. The AO, CPC erred in declared the appellant's return as defective. ii. The credit for TDS ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issue of credit of TDS and taxing the corresponding income are governed by the provisions of section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 37BA of the Rules extracted hereunder: [Credit for tax deducted. 199. (1) Any deduction made in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Chapter and paid to the Central Government shall be treated as a payment of tax on behalf of the person from whose income the deduction was made, or of the owner of the security, or of the depositor or of the owner of property or of the unit-holder, or of the shareholder, as the case may be. (2) Any sum referred to in sub-section (1A) of section 192 and paid to the Central Government shall be treated as the tax paid on behalf of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ub-rule (1).) (ii) The declaration filed by the deductee under clause (i) shall contain the name, address, permanent account number of the person to whom credit is to be given, payment or credit in relation to which credit is to be given and reasons for giving credit to such person. (iii) The deductor shall issue the certificate for deduction of tax at source in the name of the person in whose name credit is shown in the information relating to deduction of tax referred to in sub-rule (1) and shall keep the declaration in his safe custody. (3) (i) Credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the Central Government, shall be given for the assessment year for which such income is assessable. (ii) Where tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the return for A.Y. 2023-24. Instead, as provided u/s 199 and Rule 37BA(2) of the Act, the appellant ought to have filed the declaration with the deductor and ought to have got the appropriate corrections carried out in the TDS statements filed by the deductor, by filing with the deductor the necessary declarations requesting that TDS be issued for A.Ys. 2021-22, 2022-23 & 2023-24. Despite the deficiency letter issued by the AO, CPC, no such action has been carried out by the appellant and the TDS continues to appear for A.Y. 2023- 24 instead of A.Ys. 2021-22, 2022-23 & 2023-24. 6.2.4. As on the date of processing, the impugned income was appearing in Form 26AS of the appellant's PAN but was not included in computing the tot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut by the Ld.Counsel for the assessee before us also, that the TDS deducted during the impugned year of Rs. 5,24,600/- on receipts of Rs. 5,24,60,000/-, pertained to receipts of three assessment years as under: A.Y. Receipts declared (Rs.) 2021-22 1,95,09,600/- 2022-23 72,50,400/- 2023-24 2,57,00,000/- Total 5,24,60,000/- the Ld.CIT(A) held that the CPC was correct in restricting the grant of TDS credit to the extent of that relating to the receipts reflected in the return of income filed in the impugned assessment year. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee before us was unable to point out any infirmity in the findings of the Ld.CIT(A), as stated above, both with regard to the interpretation of law on the gra....