Waiver
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....depends upon consent, and the fact that the other party has acted on it is sufficient consideration. … It seems that, in general, where one party has, by his words or conduct, made to the other a promise or assurance which was intended to affect the legal relations between them and to be acted on accordingly, then, once the other party has taken him at his word and acted on it, so as to alter his position, the party who gave the promise or assurance cannot afterwards be allowed to revert to the previous legal relationship as if no such promise or assurance had been made by him, but he must accept their legal relations subject to the qualification which he has himself so introduced, even though it is not supported in point of law by....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ry case be inferred merely from the failure of the party to take the objection. Waiver can be inferred only if and after it is shown that the party knew about the relevant facts and was aware of his right to take the objection in question. As Sir John Romilly, M.R. has observed in Vyvyan v. Vyvyan (1861) 30 Beav 65 : 54 ER 813: (Beav p. 75: ER p. 817) Waiver or acquiescence, like election, presupposes that the person to be bound is fully cognizant of his rights, and that being so, he neglects to enforce them, or chooses one benefit instead of another, either, but not both, of which he might claim. In Krishna Bahadur v. Purna Theatre- 2004 (8) TMI 685 - SUPREME COURT, it has been ruled that: A right can be waived by the party for whose b....