Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t when the case of main appellant involved demand of duty interest and penalty has been settled under SVLDRS-2019 whether the penalty on co-noticees can be continued or otherwise? 2. Shri P.K. Shetty, A.X.S, Jiwan and Shri N.K. Oza counsels and consultant appeared on behalf of the appellants. They submitted that now it is a settled law that when the main case of demand of duty is settled under SVLDRS-2019, the penalty on the co-noticee will not sustain. They relied on the following judgments: • Anil K Modani vide Final Order No. A/87176-87178/2023 dated 30.11.23 • Vikas Agarwal Final Order No. A/11738/2021 • Uni Deritend Ltd. 2011 (272) ELT 312 (T. Mum) • Ispat Indus. Ltd. 2008 (226) EL....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orised Representative, was in the specific context of 'conjunctions' employed in rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and the consequence thereof for recovery of credit along with interest. Chapter V of Finance Act, 2019 expressly pertains to 'legacy dispute resolution scheme' which considered deposit of duty involved in dispute to suffice for grant of relief of interest, penalty and any other consequence under Central Excise Act, 1944 or Finance Act, 1944. The scheme is all about 'tax dues' which itself has been set out in section 123 of Finance Act, 2019 with all the alternatives restricting themselves to the total amount of duty or total amount of duty in dispute, as the case may be. Furthermore, section 124 of Finance Act, 2019 specifie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 08.05.2024 "In this appeal the appellant has challenged the personal penalty of Rs.50,000/- under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The penalty was imposed on the charge of abating the evasion of duty by M/s. Atlas Plastics. When the matter was called out written submission was placed on record by the appellant wherein it is submitted that the main party's case of M/s. Atlas Plastics has been settled under SVLDRS 2019 and this Tribunal has disposed of appeal vide order No. 12602/2023 dated 07.11.2023 in the light of the settlement of the case of main party, hence the personal penalty of appellant be set aside. It is also submitted that the appellant has not played any role for evasion of duty by M/s. Atlas ....