Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Revenue : Shri Ram Krishn Kedia, Sr. DR ORDER PER BENCH : Both these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order(s) passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi ["Ld.CIT(A)"] and relate to AYs. 2010-11 and 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) in confirming the penalty levied by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Ld.CIT(A) on estimated basis and hence penalty could not have been levied on estimated additions. In support of this proposition, the Ld A.R placed here reliance on the following case law:- a. ETCO Profiles (P.) Ltd., vs. ACIT [2015] 61 taxmann.com 470 (Mumbai-Trib.); b. Jatin Enterprises vs. ACIT, 2024 (3) TMI 1073 - ITAT Mumbai; 3.1. The Ld.AR further submitted that the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d it was held that - no penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable where the addition is made on estimated basis. The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court has also expressed the same view in the case of CIT vs. Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd., [303 ITR 53]. Both these decisions have been followed by the Mumbai Benches of the Tribunal in the case of Jatin Enterprises vs. ACIT (supra). 5.1. In the....