2019 (7) TMI 2044

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....509 / 2019<br>Central Excise<br>HON&#39;BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. RAMESH NAIR For the Appellant : Shri S. J. Vyas, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri K.J. Kinariwala, Asst. Commissioner(AR) RAMESH NAIR The brief facts of the case are that the appellants have availed Cenvat Credit in respect of input services which were used by their job worker which is again the unit of the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tements of Mr. Vishal Ranka, recorded under section 14. He also referred to the monthly ER-1 return wherein there is no payment of duty on excisable goods manufactured by the job workers. He submits that since all the services, even though used by the job worker, are for manufacture of appellant's goods, therefore, they are entitled for the Cenvat Credit. He placed reliance on the decisions of CES....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntitled for the Cenvat Credit. There is a specific provision in Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules in respect of job work goods manufactured under Notification no. 214/86-C.E. which is reproduced below: Rule 3 - CENVAT Credit. - (1) a manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of taxable service shall be allowed to take credit of- (i) The duty of excise specified in the ....