Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1972 (10) TMI 36

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow, on the following question : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified legally in cancelling the order of penalty passed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? " The assessee is a registered fir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r gross or wilful neglect on his part. In the instant case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal found that the enhancement in the assessee's income was made because the profit shown by the assessee was only 5 per cent. of the sales which was considered by the income-tax authorities to be rather low. On that ground the books were rejected and profit was assessed by applying a rate of 12 1/2% per cent....