Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1973 (11) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he opinion of this court : " (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the admission made by the assessee in his application under section 271(4A) to the effect that the value of the assets held in the name of his son may be added to his own income, will not be binding on the assessee in the event of there being no settlement of his income, as requested for by him ? (2) Whether the Tribunal was justified in the income earned by the assessee in the name of his son in spite of the assessee's admission that his son was his benamidar? (3) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that there was no material on record to prove that the assessee's son was a benamidar, pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ribunal held that any admission made by the assessee in his application for settlement under section 271(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not be held binding on the assessee if his proposal for settlement was not accepted by the department. If the respondent's assessment was on merits, it was incumbent on the department to have furnished the requisite material showing that his son, Darshanlal, was his benamidar and any admission made in the offer by way of an application for settlement under section 271(4A) could not be considered if the offer was not accepted by the department. The department made an application to the Appellate Tribunal under section 256(1) of the Act, which was rejected. Misc. Civil Case No. 492 of 1973 involves....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iculars of income in respect of which the penalty is imposable or of the inaccuracy of particulars furnished in respect of such income, voluntarily and in good faith, made full and true disclosure of such particulars ; (b) has co-operated in any enquiry relating to the assessment of such income ; and (c) has either paid or made satisfactory arrangements for payment of any tax or interest payable in consequence of an order passed under this Act in respect of the relevant assessment year : Provided that if in a case the minimum penalty imposable under-clause (i) or, as the case may be, clause (iii) of sub-section (1) in respect of the relevant assessment year, or where such disclosure relates to more than one assessment year, the agg....