Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (10) TMI 1428

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner: M/s. K.A.Parthasarathy, N.Chandirasekar For the Respondent: Mr. V.Prasanth Kiran, GA (T) COMMON ORDER In all these writ petitions, assessment orders pertaining to distinct assessment periods are challenged. The petitioner is involved in quarrying and mining of rough stone. As a registered person, the petitioner filed returns under applicable GST statutes. In relation thereto, in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is concerned. As regard seigniorage charges, he submits that the judgment of the Division Bench squarely applies. 3. Mr. V.Prasanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. He submits that the petitioner was provided sufficient opportunity and that the impugned orders record that the petitioner failed to avail of personal hearing although offered thrice by the asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egard thereto, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is liable to be accepted. As a consequence, on this aspect, the impugned assessment orders call for interference. 6. Accordingly, the assessment orders impugned herein are quashed only insofar as such orders deal with the imposition of GST on forward charge basis on the turnover. Consequently, these matters are remanded for re-....