2024 (10) TMI 1452
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocates. For the Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Banati with Mr. Ashish Sareen, Mr. Adil Asghar and Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advocates. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Petitioner is defending a commercial suit. 2. When the case was at the stage of defendant's evidence, the defendant wanted to examine one official from concerned GST Office in order to show that no input tax credit with respect to the i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ness himself, volunteered, during the cross-examination that the GST input of all these invoices has already been taken by the defendant. According to him, these could also be seen on GST Portal. 7. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner (defendant) is to the contrary as according to them, they did not receive any such input. 8. It does become obvious that despite making be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on put by him to the plaintiff in cross-examination, the present petition is allowed and petitioner is granted one opportunity to take requisite steps for purposes of summoning the concerned Official. 12. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, if permitted, he would take the process dasti in order to ensure that such witness is duly summoned and provides the record before the learned T....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI