2024 (10) TMI 1331

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant(S) : GP For Services I For the Respondent : J.N Venkata Suresh Kumar JUDGMENT: PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. NARENDAR 1. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the appellants and learned counsel for the Respondent/Writ Petitioner. 2. The intra-Court appeal is preferred assailing the order of the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 4. In fact, there was no adversarial order, resulting in no cause of action to canvass or maintain the Writ Petition. The mere pendency of the inquiry or the Writ Petitioner's apprehension of any adverse orders cannot be a ground to maintain the Writ Petition. It is apparent that no rights of the Writ Petitioner have been abridged, nor has the inquiry resulted in altering the service condition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat there are no records relating to the processing of the claim or consideration of the pending tax revision cases. He further contends that the charge itself could not have been framed in the absence of sufficient material. Additionally, he argues that there has been a gross miscarriage of justice, as neither the inquiry officer nor the presiding officer furnished the documents sought by him. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ry authority, an action that has now been pre-empted by the impugned order. In our opinion, the Writ Petition itself was premature in the absence of any adverse impact on the rights or service conditions of the Writ Petitioner. 8. In that view of the matter, we have no hesitation in allowing the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part. The impugned order is set aside, and the matter ....