Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 2115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....number. Shri Ashok Lalwani submits that appellant/plaintiff filed the said suit for declaration that his house is constructed in khasra No.309 aforesaid with further prayer to restrain the bank to interfere in his possession. 3. Shri Lalwani submits that while deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the Court was only required to see the plaint averments. The defence of respondents on factual basis cannot be gone into. Since the entire action of bank is in relation to a property situated in a different khasra number, no steps in relation to this khasra number have been taken as per Section 13 of the Secularization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'SARFASI Act'). The aforesaid Act cannot be made applicable in the present case. Thus, the remedy prescribed under Section 17 of the SARFASI Act is not available to the appellant nor bar created under Section 34 of the said Act can be pressed into service. Reliance is placed on AIR 2014 SC 371 (Jagdish Singh vs. Heeralal and others). 4. I have heard him at length and perused the record. 5. The trial Court has considered this argument of the appellant and rightly ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....27;्रस्त सम्पत्ति का फर्जी  विक्रय-पत्र दिनाकित 19.11.2010 बनाकर वादग्रस्त संपत्ति को खसरा नंबर 260 का भाग बताकर प्रतिवादी कृ0 2 बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के पास बंधक रख कर एक बड़ी राशि ऋण के रूप में प्राप्त कर ली हे" | वादपत्र की कांडि&....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5;ि एक तो कथित रुप से हेमा प्रजापति ने खसरा न0 1039 के भाग को खसरा क0 260 का हिस्सा बता दिया और दूसरा उस पर ऋण प्राप्त कर उक्त खसरा क0 1039 के भाग को जो कथित रुप से खसरा क० 260 हे. प्रतिवादी कृ0 2 के पक्ष में बंधक कर दिया | यह भी तथ्य स्पष्....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....319; ऋणे के लिये प्रतिभूति आरित बन गई है | प्रतिवादी कमांक 2 द्वारा उक्त  प्रतिभूति सम्पत्ति के नीलामी हेतु ही अधिनियम की अधीन कार्यवाही कर रहे  है | अधिनियम की धारा 17 ऋणी सहित प्रत्येक विक्षुद्ध व्यक्ति अधिनिय&#23....