TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (10) TMI 917
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppeal of the Assessee against the Assessment Order, dated 30/03/2016, passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. The Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: 1) "The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of Assessing officer rejecting books of accounts without appreciating that books of accounts are duly audited and non-maintenance of the stock register cannot be a ground for rejecting books of accounts and further the Ld CIT(A) did not deal with various submissions of the Assessee regarding inconsistencies in invoices etc of third parties etc and Ld CIT(A) failed to appreciate said third parties were never summoned by the Assessing Officer and hence the rejection of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d the Assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, vide assessment order dated 30/03/2016 the Assessing total income of the Appellant at INR 80,79,450/-. The Assessing Officer rejected books of account of the Appellant and computed gross profit at the rate of 22.5% of aggregate turnover of INR 25,81,89,761/- reflected in the books of accounts after granting the benefit of gross profit already declared by the Appellant amounting to INR 4,84,84,653/- the Assessing Officer made in addition of INR 96,08,043/-. (5,80,92,696 - 4,84,84,653). 5. Being aggrieved the Appellant preferred appeal before CIT(A). In the written submission, dated 06/01/2023, filed before the CIT(A) it was contending on behalf of the Appellant as under :- "That appellant&....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0-11, Where assessee himself had declared gross profit in excess of 25%, he made adhoc disallowance of 20% of purchases of month of February 2010 & March 2010 and for A.Y. 2013-14 he did not segregate total turnover of assessee into turnover of wafer/dry snacks and turnover of edible oil and simply applied gross profit rate of 22.5% to entire turnover. ........" (Emphasis Supplied) However, the CIT(A) was not convinced and therefore, declined to grant any relief to the Appellant. Thus, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal vide order dated 16/05/2023. 6. Being aggrieved the Appellant has now prefer the present appeal before the Tribunal on the grounds reproduced in paragraph 2 above. 7. When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the Learned Aut....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dated 09/01/2023, file before CIT(A) and submissions dated 29/03/2016 file before the Assessing Officer. 8. Per contra, the Learned Departmental Representative place reliance upon and Assessing Officer and CIT(A). However the Learned Departmental Representative could not controvert the averments made by the Learned Authorized Representative of the Appellant which was supported by the submissions filed before the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) [place before us as part of the paper-book]. 9. We have considered the rival submission and perused the material on record. On perusal of Financial Statement for the relevant previous year, we find that the aggregate revenue from operations stood at INR 25,81,89,761/- and the same consisted of (a) reve....