Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1976 (2) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erred for our opinion : " Whether, upon the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that no penalty could be levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, upon the assessee ? " The facts were that for the assessment year 1965-66 the assessee-firm filed a return showing an income of Rs. 42,887. The Income-tax Officer complet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lanation given regarding the cash credit was not even probable. The assessee filed an appeal and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called the " Appellate Tribunal ") set aside both these findings and recorded the following findings. It found : " No doubt, though her statement was not satisfactory for the purposes of assessment proceedings, yet it cannot be said that the statement was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... any finding that the assessee has discharged its burden and has satisfactorily established that it was not guilty of fraud or gross misconduct. According to him, after the addition of the Explanation, the presumption of fact arose against the assessee and it was for it to establish the same by positive evidence that he was neither guilty of fraud nor he was guilty of gross misconduct. Without goi....