2018 (1) TMI 1744
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e : Sm t. Chandrakanta ORDER PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, A.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-2 Ludhiana dt. 13/07/2017. 2. The only effective ground of appeal is as under: 1. That the Ld. CIT(A)-2 has erred in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs. 90,404/- u/s 271(1)(c) on the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of Rs. 2,92,569....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Ld. AR submitted that the disallowance not added in the return due to oversight and it was a bonafide mistake. He relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Reliance Petro products Pvt. Ltd. (322 ITR 158) dated 17/03/2010 held that when the assessee has made a claim under the bonafide belief and disallowance of such claim would not attract levy of penalty. 6.....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI