2024 (10) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Assistant Commissioner, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER Penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- imposed on Appellant under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as co-noticee to principal violator M/s. Sumira Plastic of the terms of DEEC schemes by diverting imported goods to local market without fulfilment of export obligation, is assailed in this appeal. 2. Fact of the case, in bri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urse of hearing of the appeal, learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that there were two co-noticees who stood on the same footing and penalised for the same amount for carrying out job work on behalf of the main noticee, whose appeal got dismissed for non-compliance of stay order, but this Tribunal vide its order No. A/85516/2022 dated 13.05.2022 in Appeal No. C/907/2012 had absolved liabil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ship alone would not automatically make a person liable for any violation by the other related person to justify imposition of penalty. 5. I have gone through the case record and the judgment passed by this Tribunal in respect of the other co-noticee/job-worker but before going to the findings made by this Tribunal on the issue, it would be worthwhile to place it on record the findings of learned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sumira Plastic from where her sister herself had resigned long back in 1996. Be that as it may, the relevant finding of this Tribunal in respect of other co-noticee Shri Kumar Sayani passed on dated 13.05.2022 runs as follows: "... Only because the appellant knew Shri G.N. Pai cannot be a reason for claiming that the appellant was in hand in glove for the fraud committed by Shri Pai in diverting....