Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (9) TMI 350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Revenue : Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D/R ORDER PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM : This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 14/05/2024 by NFAC Delhi [in short 'ld. CIT(A)] pertaining to AY 2017- 18. 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that, the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the AO in passing the order u/s 154 of the Act thereby....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6,953/-. 3.2. The assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) but without any success. 4. Before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that while framing the original assessment order, the AO was well aware of the decision in favour of the assessee, insofar as there was delay in deposit of EPF & ESI and after verifying the claim, the AO allowed it. Subsequently, when the Hon'ble Supr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The question of relying on any judgment in favour of the revenue to invoke powers u/s 154 of the Act has not manifested from order u/s 154 of the Act. Thus, both the lower authorities erred in rectifying the assessment order on the basis of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. (supra). 6. In the case of CIT vs. Mahavir Drilling Co. reported in 27....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n assessee, the action on the part of AO in invoking section 154 of the Act rectifying the mistake in wrongly granting the benefit to assessee in the original assessment order could always be withdrawn. The assessee submitted that the law laid down in N.C. Budharaja & Co. case (supra) was prospective in nature, therefore, the same would not apply to this case because, on the date when AO granted r....