Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (9) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on the premise that there were unexplained credit to the account of the petitioner to an extent of Rs. 40,25,000/- that the assessee has not filed the return of income tax for the assessment year 2020-2021. In response to the above notice, the petitioner submitted his reply dated 25.04.2024 wherein, inter alia he has stated that he has received a sum of Rs. 34,25,000/- from one Robert Francis Sahayam as loan through bank account. The said Robert Francis Sahayam is a family friend, who was working abroad. The entire money had been received only through proper banking channel and the same was returnable to the said Robert Francis Sahayam. The copies of the bank account statements to that effect were also enclosed along with the reply. The petitioner in his reply requested for an opportunity of personal hearing and also sought for the basis on which they have arrived at the figure of Rs. 40,25,000/- as representing unexplained credit. 3. The impugned order dated 30.04.2024 under Section 148-A(d) is passed on the finding that the petitioner has not filed return of income tax for the assessment year 2020-2021 as specified under Section 139(1) of the Act and that, the said Robert Fran....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hould not be issued on the basis of information which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in his case for the relevant assessment year and results of enquiry conducted, if any, as per clause (a); (c) consider the reply of assessee furnished, if any, in response to the show-cause notice referred to in clause (b); (d) decide, on the basis of material available on record including reply of the assessee, whether or not it is a fit case to issue a notice under Section 148, by passing an order, with the prior approval of specified authority, within one month from the end of the month in which the reply referred to in clause (c) is received by him, or where no such reply is furnished, within one month from the end of the month in which time or extended time allowed to furnish a reply as per clause (b) expires: ..................... 16. Further pre-Finance Act, 2021, the reopening was permissible for a maximum period up to six years and in some cases beyond even six years leading to uncertainty for a considerable time. Therefore, Parliament thought it fit to amend the Income Tax Act to simplify the tax administration, ease compl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the opinion that before any notice is issued under Section 148-A(b) and an opportunity is to be given to the assessee, there is a requirement of conducting any enquiry, the assessing officer may do so and conduct any enquiry. Thus if the assessing officer is of the opinion that any enquiry is required, the assessing officer can do so, however, with the prior approval of the specified authority, with respect to the information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 22. Thus, the new provisions substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 being remedial and benevolent in nature and substituted with a specific aim and object to protect the rights and interest of the assessee as well as and the same being in public interest, the respective High Courts have rightly held that the benefit of new provisions shall be made available even in respect of the proceedings relating to past assessment years, provided Section 148 notice has been issued on or after 1-4- 2021. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the various High Courts in holding so." 7. After referring to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashish Agarwal,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....would be considered/dealt with is binding on the respondent authorities. In this regard, it may be relevant to refer to the earlier order of this Court dated 16.11.2022 passed in W.P.(MD)No.21357 of 2022, which reads as under: "12. In the circumstances, though this Court finds that the arguments of the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent may have merits, I do not intend to express any view in the light of the Circulars which has prescribed the procedure to be followed if a request for personal hearing is made and which expressly provides for grant of personal hearing vide Clause viii of the Department circular in F.No.299/10/2022-Dir(Inv.III)/611, dated 01.08.2022 reads as under: "viii. If an assessee requests for a personal hearing, the same may be dealt with following the principle of natural justice by giving a reasonable period for compliance of notice specifying the date of hearing." I am of the view that the above Circular is binding and it may not be open to the Revenue to contend to the contrary. In this regard, it may be relevant to refer to the following judgments, wherein, it has been consistently held by the Supreme Court that Circular....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inding nature of a circular; the department's actions have to be consistent with the circulars; and that consistency and discipline are of far greater importance than winning or losing court proceedings. (iv). In UCO Bank v. Commissioner of Income-tax, [1999] 237 ITR 889, the apex Court held that the circular issued by the Revenue under section 119 of the Income-tax Act are binding on the revenue and such circulars are meant for ensuring proper administration of the statute and they are designed to mitigate the rigours of the application of a particular provision of the statute in certain situations by applying a beneficial interpretation to the provision in question. (v). In Commissioner of Income-tax v. Kelvinator of India Ltd., [2002] 256 ITR 1 (Delhi), it was held that the Board has power to issue circulars under section 119 of the Income-tax Act and it is trite that circulars which are issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes are legally binding on the Revenue. (vi). In Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., [2004] 165 ELT 257, the apex Court held that the circulars issued by the Revenue under section 37-B of the Cen....