Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (9) TMI 244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....22.06.2021 of the second respondent, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 38,57,329/- together with interest and penalty. 3. Operative portion of the impugned Order reads as under:- i. I uphold invocation of extended period of time under Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 to demand Service Tax in this case; ii. I confirm the demand of Rs. 38,57,329/- (Rupees Thirty Eight Lakhs Fifty Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty Nine only) (ST: Rs. 36,00,173/-, SBC: Rs. 1,28,578/- and KKC: Rs. 1,28,578/-) on the services rendered by M/s.Imperial Spirits and Wines Private Limited during the period from June 2015 to June 2017; iii. I order recovery of appropriate interest on the amount of Service Tax indicated in sl.no. (ii) above und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er hand, in response to Form No.SVLDRS-1, the respondents by Form No.SVLDRS-2, determined the amount payable by the petitioner as Rs. 38,57,329.00/-, which the petitioner also agreed to pay as was required to be paid within a period of thirty days from the date of generation of Form No.SVLDRS-3 by the respondent Designated Committee. It is further submitted that however on 24.03.2020, lockdown was imposed as a result of which, the petitioner was unable to pay the amount in time. Immediately, the respondents have issued the Show Cause Notice dated 02.12.2020, and have confirmed the demand vide impugned Order-in-Original dated 22.06.2021. It is submitted that there are several decisions of this Court wherein, this Court has come to rescue the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned the option to settle the dispute under the aforesaid Scheme and therefore, the Show Cause Notice dated 02.12.2020 was issued, which has culminated in the impugned order. It is further submitted that the petitioner has an alternate remedy and therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 11. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 12. The attempt of the parliament to recover the arrears of tax under the aforesaid Scheme in Finance Act No.2/2019 vide Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was partly frustrated and derailed due to outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic. Pursuant to which, lockdown was imposed with effe....