Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1977 (12) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the assessment year 1965-66 by the Tribunal, Madras Bench, reads as follows : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in setting aside the assessment made by the ITO for the assessment year 1965-66, and directing the ITO to redo the same after giving an opportunity to the assessee to exercise the option as provided under s. 3(1)(b) of the I.T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng that it was on December 31, 1963, and the revenue contending that it was earlier. As mentioned already, this controversy has now been settled by the Tribunal's finding that the business commenced on April 29, 1963. The Tribunal, after having determined the date of commencement of the business, proceeded to observe that the assessee would have a right to exercise his option under s. 3(1)(b) of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er contention was raised that for a newly set up business as in the present case, it is only cl. (e) of sub-s. (1) of s. 3 that would apply. But even the terms of cl. (e), either (i) or (ii), are not satisfied on the facts of this case. Cl. (e) has a limited application. It is not a provision dealing with all cases of business that have been newly set up. An interpretation making it all comprehens....