Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1976 (1) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee is a reputed film star and a stage actress. The assessment year is 1960-61. The previous year is the financial year. By rejecting the explanation offered by the assessee in respect of certain receipts, the ITO brought certain sums to tax as stated in the statement of the case. The said assessment was made on July 9, 1964, in which the ITO has made the following endorsement: " Issue a notice un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f penalty could be said to have been initiated in the course of the assessment proceedings within the meaning of s. 275 of the I.T. Act, 1961 ?" Mr. Ajit Sengupta, the learned counsel for the revenue, has contended before us that the above question should be answered in the affirmative and in favour of the revenue by following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of D. M. Manasvi v. CIT ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... satisfied in the course of the assessment proceedings that the assessee had concealed his income and that his satisfaction, in the very nature of things, precedes the issuance of the notice which is a consequence of his said satisfaction. It has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. S. V. Angidi Chettiar [1962] 44 ITR 739 that the ITO was satisfied in the course of the assessment ....