Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 931

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. ITA 475/Mum/2024 is filed by Shri Tarun Mohan Jani ('Appellant Assessee') for A.Y. 2021-22 against the appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi ('ld. CIT(A)') dated 06.12.2023 wherein the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') dated 29....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tamp duty valuation is because of distress sale and in the absence of any Co-op Housing Society as well as the location. It is the claim of the assessee that nobody was ready to buy the property as the property is in low lying water logging area. The assessee also submitted that identically in the case of wife of the assessee, AO has referred the matter for valuation cell. 5. Ld. AO referred to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed u/s 50C(2) of the Act but does not apply to section 56(2)(x) of the Act. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. 9. The assessee aggrieved with that preferred appeal before us. The ld. Authorized Representative relied on the decision of [1] Chennai Bench in ITA No. 377/Chny/2021 dated 22.07.2022 wherein the benefit of tolerance limit was granted u/s 56(2)(x) of the Act, [2] in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection amount equal to 10% of the consideration is not chargeable to tax. 12. In the present case, the amount of difference between the value determined by the ld. DVO and the transaction value is less than 10% of the consideration. Therefore, no addition is required to be made in the hands of the assessee. 13. The various judicial precedents cited by the ld. Authorized Representative also s....