Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 871

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lid and without jurisdiction as same been issued without prior mandatory approval of specified authority in terms of section 151 of the Act (un-amended Section 151) and therefore the consequential proceeding in form of re-assessment order is invalid, without jurisdiction and void ab initio. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the notice issued under section 148 by the AO is illegal, bad in law, without jurisdiction and barred by time limitation, hence, the reassessment order dated 03/09/2021 passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre is also illegal, bad in law and without jurisdiction. 3. That the impugned re-assessment is passed without issuing the mandatory notice u/s 143 (2) of the Act, thus default of non-iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was granted by the lower authorities and that the assessee has complete details to explain the source of alleged cash deposit of Rs. 12,60,000/- during the demonetization period and if one more opportunity is granted then the assessee can file necessary details to the satisfaction of the Ld. A.O. He also submitted that the assessee is a Senior Citizen and she runs a kirana store and has cash in hand of approximate Rs. 7 lakhs as on 01.04.2016 duly reflected in ITR and coupled with the income earned during the year, sufficient cash was available in her hand to deposit the alleged sum of Rs. 12,60,000/-. 4. On the other hand Ld. Departmental Representative apart from relying on the orders of lower authorities submitted that the assessee did....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e at Rs. 12,60,000/-. Thereafter the assessee challenged the order of the A.O before Ld. CIT(A) but except filing the appeal no other evidences were placed. As a result Ld. CIT(A) placing reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Nirmal Singh and others (Cr No.3791 of 2013 (O&M) dated 01.05.2014) confirmed the addition made by the A.O for placing any reasonable cogent and valid arguments/contentions by the appellant. Before this Tribunal Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee is regularly filing the income tax return and taking into account the accumulated cash in hand for the past so many years coupled with the opening cash in hand as on 01.04.2016 as well as the income earned pr....