Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 870

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Income Tax (Appeals). Since, these appeals relate to the same assessee involving identical issues, they have been clubbed together and disposed of in a consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. The only substantive issue involved in these appeals relate to disallowance of assessee's claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. Briefly the facts are, the assessee is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). As stated by the Assessing Officer, the assessee is engaged in the business of trading in all kinds of pipes. Besides, the assessee is also engaged in manufacturing of waste disposal bins for onward sales to various Government agencies and municipal boards, on tender basis. The assessee start....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... disallowances, assessee preferred appeals before learned first appellate authority. However, learned first appellate authority confirmed the disallowances in assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2014- 15. Whereas, he allowed the claim in assessment year 2010-11. 4. Before us, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that while deciding the issue in assessment year 2014- 15, though, learned first appellate authority has confirmed the disallowances, however, while deciding assessee's appeal contesting such disallowance, the Tribunal in ITA No. 507/Del/2019, dated 02.06.2020 has allowed assessee's claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Act. He submitted, since, the disallowances in the impugned assessment years are based o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessment year 2014-15. Thus, he submitted, the issue is squarely covered by the decision of the Tribunal. 7. We have considered rival submissions and perused the materials on record. Undisputedly, the assessee has started claiming deduction under section 80IC of the Act for Unit III from assessment year 2010-11 onwards. It is a fact on record that assessee's claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Act was allowed in assessment years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14. In fact, assessment for assessment year 2010-11, the initial assessment year, was completed under section 143(3) of the Act after thoroughly examining the claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Act. While examining assessee's claim of deduction under section 8....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act to be invalid as it was on a mere change of opinion, but he also decided the issue on merits following the decision of the Tribunal in assessment year 2014- 15. 9. The facts discussed above clearly establish that all the assessment years under appeal, factually, stand on identical footing. Therefore, the contention of learned Departmental Representative that the assessment order for assessment year 2010-11 was not considered by the Tribunal while deciding the appeal for assessment year 2014-15, in our view, is irrelevant and immaterial. Moreso, considering the fact that in the reassessment order for assessment year 2010-11, the Assessing Officer himself has made it clear that reope....