Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 1525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. This petition is filed by the Surat District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. challenging the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 31.03.2021 and the order dated 23.03.2022 disposing off objections. 4. Facts in brief are that for the assessment year 2017-18, the petitioner filed the original return of income on 21.09.2017 declaring a total income of Rs. 3,44,90,840/-. Thereafter, the case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny assessment and a notice under Section 143(2) dated 14.08.2018 was issued. A notice under section 142(1) was issued on 19.08.2019 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue would submit that it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs. 5,06,10,523/- under Section 80P which included an amount of Rs. 5,05,60,523/-. Out of such claimed deduction interest of Rs. 3,59,26,908/- was renewed by the assessee from the Surat District Bank which is a cooperative Bank and not a cooperative society and therefore not eligible for deduction. Annexure to the notice under Section 142 only took into consideration nationalized banks and therefore there was no change of opinion. 8. He would rely on a decision of the Division Bench in the case of KATLARY KARIYANA MERCHANT SAHKARI SARAFI MANDALI LTD Versus ASST. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX reported in [2022] 140 taxmann.com ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../- was received by the assessee from the Surat District Co-op Bank Ltd which is a co-operative bank and not a co-operative society. As per section 80P(2) (d) of the I.T. Act, 1961; same was not allowable and it was required to be disallowed. ... ... 6. Basis of forming reason to believe and details of escapement of income: As discussed hereinabove, that the assessee had claimed deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the I.T. Act, 1961 of interest of Rs. 3,59,26,098/- received from investment made in Surat Cooperative Bank which is not allowable under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Therefore, I have reason to believe that the income to the tune of Rs. 3,59,26,098/- chargeable to tax has escaped assessment within the meaning of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned total interest income of Rs. 1,33.11.637/- as under: Bank Of baroda : 30,164/- Bank Of India : 56,30,967/- Dena Bank : 110,2114/- SBI : 65,34,392/- and the same is claimed as deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the I.T. Act. B. The plain reading of provision of Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act state: "In respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the Co-Operative Society from its investment with any other Co-Operative Society, a Co-Operative Society is entitled to deduction of the whole of such income u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. However, Interest earned from investment made in any Bank, not being a Co- Operative Society, is not deductible u/s 80P(2)(d)". Fro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....perusal of the reasons recorded for the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961, it is apparent that there is no new fresh material available with the respondent nor there is any live link shown by the respondent with the material on record for formation of reasonable belief to reopen the assessment within the period of four years. The respondent has relied upon the assessment record for the year under consideration. The respondent has also relied upon the Circular No. 665 of CBDT dated 5th October, 1993 for the issue of considering the Long Term Capital Gains and the Short Term Capital Gains shown by the petitioner in the return of income considering the sell of the Government of India Securities as investment instead of stoc....