2024 (8) TMI 581
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... J. 1. Heard Sri Parth Goswami, Advocate holding brief Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.09.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Sector- 8, State Goods & Service Tax, Bareilly as well as the impugned order dated 07.07.2022 passed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed, rejecting the claim under Section 73 of the SGST Act, as no reason has been assigned therein for rejection and only refers the ITC claim rejected, against which an appeal was preferred, which has also been dismissed without considering the material available on record. 4. He further submits that since the petitioner was neither given any opportunity of hearing nor to lead his case as no dat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....been assigned for initiating the proceedings under Section 73 of the SGST Act, and the impugned order has been passed by the assessing authority i.e. respondent no.3 without assigning any reason. Further, in the appeal, new facts were brought to which the petitioner was never put to notice, learned Standing Counsel could not dispute the said fact that for the first time, the new facts have been me....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI