Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 581

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... J. 1. Heard Sri Parth Goswami, Advocate holding brief Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.09.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Sector- 8, State Goods & Service Tax, Bareilly as well as the impugned order dated 07.07.2022 passed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed, rejecting the claim under Section 73 of the SGST Act, as no reason has been assigned therein for rejection and only refers the ITC claim rejected, against which an appeal was preferred, which has also been dismissed without considering the material available on record. 4. He further submits that since the petitioner was neither given any opportunity of hearing nor to lead his case as no dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been assigned for initiating the proceedings under Section 73 of the SGST Act, and the impugned order has been passed by the assessing authority i.e. respondent no.3 without assigning any reason. Further, in the appeal, new facts were brought to which the petitioner was never put to notice, learned Standing Counsel could not dispute the said fact that for the first time, the new facts have been me....