Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the Department of Central Excise was in the name of a different person. As the license holders were unable to carry on the specified business on their own, assessee was using the license without being transferred to its name based on a mutual understanding between the license holder and the assessee. 2.2 The assessee has submitted that as per the arrangement, the assessee was to account the purchases and the sales relating to the IMFL license in the name of the license holder and declared the net profit from the sale business in the hands of the assessee only. 2.3 The assessee submitted before the Ld.AO that the license holder had not declared the profit from sales in his return of income and that the license holder did not claim TC....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant on the same. However, credit of TCS is not transferable at this stage, it can be claimed only by the person in whose account it is reflecting in 26AS. 6.3. Further, as mentioned in the notice, as per the provision of the Act, credit of TCS cannot be granted until and unless the tax collected by the collector is paid to the credit of the Central government and the information for TCS is furnished by him to the Central government. 6.4. In the instant case, TCS has not been collected in the account of appellant, and it is not reflected in its 26AS. So, it has no evidence to show that TCS has been collected from him and hence, it is clear that neither the tax paid to the government nor the information has been furnished to the gove....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 4. It is noted that the assessee is a partnership firm, and filed its return of income for the year under consideration claiming refund of Rs. 1,72,006/-. The Ld.AO in the assessment order did not grant credit of TCS amounting to Rs. 1,69,337/- and adjusted the resultant refund against the dues for A.Y. 2016-17. The Ld.AO withheld the TCS on the purchases declared by the assessee in the return of income. It is noted that, the purchases were accepted by the Ld.AO however, in turn denied the TCS credit on the ground that the TCS was collected and was reflecting in the account of one Mr. Prashanth Shetty from Mangalore, as he was the original owner of the excise license. 4.1 It is not a disputed fact that, the business was carried on by t....