Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Tribunal Upholds CIT(A) on Professional Fees, Rejects Section 14A Disallowance Due to Lack of AO, CIT(A) Dissatisfaction.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....AO disallowed professional fees paid to doctors citing lack of evidence regarding their role as consultants, researchers or advisors. CIT(A) deleted disallowance noting assessee provided logbook, agreements, summary sheets, brochures, manuals and research papers. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s order. Regarding disallowance u/s 14A for investments, assessee had sufficient funds as evident from bank statement showing share capital proceeds and mutual fund investments. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance. For administrative expenses disallowed u/s 14A read with Rule 8D, Tribunal opined AO and CIT(A) failed to record dissatisfaction before applying Rule 8D's third component relating to administrative expenses.....