Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 390

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner and the respondent, an award came to be passed by the Arbitrator on 17.09.1997 under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. It was made the rule of the court under Section 14 read with Section 17 of the Act and a decree was accordingly drawn. 3. The award vide its paragraph 12 provided for the interest on the amount awarded. The interest was awarded for two periods viz. (i) from the date of completion of the work up to the date of the award @ 12% per annum (simple interest); and (ii) @ 15% per annum from the date of the award till the date of its payment or the date of the court decree, whichever is earlier. 4. The portion of the award which is relevant for our purpose concerning interest is reprod....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as shortfall of the interest. The petitioner contended that insofar as 15% interest is concerned, it is payable on the principal amount of compensation awarded plus 12% simple interest on the said amount. In other words, petitioner sought to include 12% interest in the principal amount of compensation awarded for the purposes of claiming 15% simple interest for the post-award period. 8. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Khambhalia, in Execution Petition No.9 of 2006 preferred by the petitioner, refused to accept the contention of the petitioner so as to award 15% interest on the principal amount of compensation awarded plus 12% simple interest thereof. In a way, he declined to grant interest upon interest for the reason that the Arbitrat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of court. 13. In the instant case, the arbitrator had granted interest for two separate periods on the principal sum adjudged only and there is no direction that the interest for the subsequent period would be payable on the principal sum adjudged including interest for the first period. 14. The sole simple issue herein for our opinion is whether interest is payable on interest or whether 15% interest per annum awarded would be on the principal sum award plus 12% per annum interest on it for the preaward period. 15. Section 29 of the Act provides that the court may in the decree order interest at the rate deemed reasonable to be paid on the principal sum as adjudged by the award meaning thereby in drawing the decree, the court may....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Arbitrators have power to grant interest akin to Section 34 CPC and it is clear that interest is not permissible upon interest awarded but only upon the claim made. In the aforesaid case, the claim made was in two parts, and in the second part, interest on delayed payment was also claimed. In that situation, the court held that the interest awarded would form part of the damages or compensation for delayed payment and would become part of the principal amount and thus, in that circumstances, Arbitrator has the power to grant interest on interest which partakes the compensation awarded. 20. In State of Haryana and Others vs. S.L. Arora and Company (2010) 3 SCC 690, it was observed that interest, unless otherwise specified, refers to s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1996, wherein the principal laid down in Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited (supra) has been accepted. 23. In the light of the above legal provisions and the case law on the subject, it is evident that ordinarily courts are not supposed to grant interest on interest except where it has been specifically provided under the statute or where there is specific stipulation to that effect under the terms and conditions of the contract. There is no dispute as to the power of the courts to award interest on interest or compound interest in a given case subject to the power conferred under the statutes or under the terms and conditions of the contract but where no such power is conferred ordinarily, the courts do not award interest on interest. 24.....