Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 315

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cial value addition rate for the Financial Year 2010-11. 1.1. Excise Appeal No. 71476 of 2013 has been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 02/SR/COMMR/GHY/2013-14 dated 20.06.2013 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Guwahati. The said appeal pertains to Unit IV of the Appellant having Central Excise Registration No. AAACL 3128 MXM 004, engaged in manufacturing of repellents for insects falling under Chapter 38 of the Frist Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 1.2. Excise Appeal No. 71477 of 2013 has been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 03/SR/COMMR/GHY/2013-14 dated 21.06.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Guwahati. The said appeal pertains to Unit VI o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r verifying the documents submitted by the appellant, fixed the special rates for the Financial Year 2009-10. 3.1. The appellant followed the same methodology for fixing the special rate for the subsequent Financial Year of 2010-11. The details of special rate, which the appellant applied for, for Unit-IV and Unit-VI, is extracted below : - Units Product and relevant Chapter Heading Applied special rate Unit IV Repellent for Insects (Chapter 38) 69.13% Unit-VI (i) Repellent for Insects (Chapter 38) (ii) Cleaning Preparations (Chapter 34) (i) 61.89% (ii) 50.70% 3.2. The Ld. Commissioner has rejected the applications for fixation of special rate by the appellant on the ground that while applying for such fixat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any, paid on the goods." b) They have duly furnished the certificate issued by the statutory auditor wherein such actual value addition computed based on the methodology extracted above. Therefore, having computed the actual value addition based on the prescribed methodology, the special rate as assessed by them is duly eligible and the same is to be fixed. c) Further, as regards the Sale Value that has been adopted, as explained in the facts above and also Note 1(a)(i) of the Notes to the Financial Statements, it has been duly disclosed that "Unit wise sales have been allocated/accounted for in the ratio of value of excise clearance made by each unit." 5.1. The appellant further submits that the issue is no longer res ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplications for fixation of special rates. 9. Thus, we observe that the issue involved in these appeals is as to whether fixation of special rate can be rejected merely because the sale value is arrived at from the audited financial statements of the Company by apportioning the same to respective units on the basis of their stock transfer ratio or not. 9.1. We observe that this issue is no longer res integra as this Tribunal has decided the same issue in the case of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Dibrugarh [2023 (10) TMI 991 - CESTAT, Kolkata]. The relevant portion of the said decision is extracted below: - "7. Now, another issue raised by the Id. Commissioner that the gross sale....